Which Countries Were The Signatories In The Sykes-Picot Agreement

Which Countries Were The Signatories In The Sykes-Picot Agreement

The country, which is currently shared between Israel and the Palestinian Authority has been attributed to whom?a) A future Israel) A future Palestine c) An international zone The territory of Arab independence has been defined to be limited north of Mersina and Adana up to 37 degrees latitude, to what degree fall Birijik, Urfa, Mardin, Midiat, Jerizat (Ibn`Uma), Amadia, to the Persian border; to the east, on the borders of Persia to the Gulf of Basra; to the south by the Indian Ocean, with the exception of Aden`s position, to remain as it is; west of the Red Sea, the Mediterranean to Nachmersina, with the exception of „parts of Syria“ located west of the „Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo districts“. Lloyd George, on the other hand, gave a speech on the objectives of war on 5 January, in which he referred to the right to self-determination and the „consent of the governed“, as well as secret treaties and changes in circumstances. Three days later, Wilson weighed his fourteen points, the twelfth of which was that „the Turkish parts of the present Ottoman Empire must be assured of a certain sovereignty, but that other nationalities which are now under Turkish rule must be assured of an undisputed security of life and an absolutely unheard of chance of autonomous development.“ The agreement is seen by many as a turning point in Western and Arab relations. She denied the promises made by the United Kingdom to the Arabs[9] concerning a national Arab homeland in the region of Syria in exchange for British support for the Ottoman Empire. The agreement was made public with others on 23 November 1917 in Moscow by the Bolsheviks[10] and repeated on 26 November 1917 in the British Guardian, so that „the British were displaced, the Arabs appalled and the Turks happy.“ [11] [12] [13] The legacy of the agreement has caused too much discontent in the region, particularly among the Denarabern, but also among the Kurds, who were denied an independent state. [14] [15] [16] [17] The British government, which approved the letters to King Hussein [Sharif of Mecca] before the outbreak of the revolt by Sir Henry McMahon, seems to be suspicious that our promises to King Hussein, as leader of the Arab nation, are consistent with French intentions to make Syria, but also of high mesopotamia. , another tunis. If our support of King Hussein and other Arab leaders at the origin and less marked prestige means anything, it means that we are ready to recognize the full sovereign independence of the Arabs from Arabia and Syria. It seems that the time has come to familiarize the French government with our detailed commitments to King Hussein and to make it clear to him whether he or someone else should be the ruler of Damascus, which is the only possible capital for an Arab state that could command the obedience of other Arab emirs. [63] In the following years, the Sykes-Picot agreement came under fierce criticism in both France and England.

Lloyd George referred to a „monstrous“ document and a „stupid“ document. Zionist aspirations were also ignored, and this decline was strongly criticized by William R. Hall, head of the British Admiralty`s secret service, who stressed that Jews „have a strong material and a very strong political interest in the future of the country and that, in the Brown area, the issue of Zionism… [should] be taken into consideration. The end result was that the Kurds were divided with their Assyrian neighbours between Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran.